Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mukherjee, Anirban
- Public-Private Partnership for Convergence of Extension Services in Indian Agriculture
Abstract Views :286 |
PDF Views:93
Authors
Affiliations
1 Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, IN
2 Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
1 Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, IN
2 Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 9 (2015), Pagination: 1557-1563Abstract
After Green revolution, Indian agriculture has seen a paradigm shift in technology development and dissemination. There is now an overflowing basket of goods and services ready to be served to the Indian farmers. But the traditional agricultural extension system designed to disseminate information and services to the farming community is not able to deliver as per expectations. This gap in demand and supply has lured private sector players to come in and explore the vast opportunities. The economic policies allow private extension agencies to capture the world's largest farming community and they have been very proactive. They supply quick, timely, efficient and appropriate services, making the traditional way of disseminating the technologies by public system seem even weaker. Though it is guided by profit motive, they serve the purpose of meeting the unmet needs of farmers in India. This situation has raised questions/doubts on the intention, policies, products they are promoting and the people they are targeting. At this juncture, the government has no option but to remain an active partner with private extension system. But it has a role to play in monitoring and controlling the quality of services and goods. Total privatization is not advisable for agriculture. So, for better utilization of scarce resources, there is a need to reduce the redundancy, repetition and to facilitate convergence and better linkage in this Public-Private Partnership. This article will focus on some essential factors that need to be considered.Keywords
Agriculture, Extension System, Farming Community, Private Sector.- Ethnopedology:An Ancient Way to Better Comprehend Modern Soil Science
Abstract Views :359 |
PDF Views:80
Authors
Affiliations
1 Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 855 107, IN
2 ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora 263 601, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
1 Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour 855 107, IN
2 ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora 263 601, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 09 (2017), Pagination: 1641-1642Abstract
Historically soils have been classified according to their appearance and characteristics. The Chinese textbook, Yugond (2500 BC) is probably the first ever on soil classification; indeed, it provided an effective and interpretative classification. Dokuchaev and others used vernacular soils like chernozem, solonetz and gley as central concepts for scientific classification. Vernacular soil names have been used throughout history and helped provide the basis of scientific classification. Folk soil taxonomies were characterized, developed, refined and used generation after generation through time-tested trials and errors. Basically, indigenous wisdom which farmers have acquired and preserved over time has repeatedly been ignored rather than streamlined. Scientific systems and detailed soil mapping have already replaced folk taxonomies, especially in the more developed countries.References
- Krasilnikov, P. V. and Tabor, J. A., Geoderma, 2003. 111, 197–215.
- Tabor, J. A. and Krasilnikov, P. V., In Soil Terminology and Correlation (ed. Krasilnikov, P. V.), Karelian Research Centre/Russian Academy of Sciences/Institute of Biology, Petrozavodsk, 2002, pp. 208–214.
- Barrera-Bassols, N. and Toledo, V. M., J. Latin Am. Geogr., 2005, 4(1), 9–41.
- Soil Survey Staff, Soil Taxonomy, Agriculture Handbook, USDA/NRCS Washington, DC, 1999, vol. 436, 2nd edn.
- FAO/ISRIC/ISSS, World Soil Resources Reports, FAO, Rome, 1998, vol. 84.
- ISSS Working Group RB, In World Reference Base for Soil Resources: Introduction (eds Deckers, J. A., Nachtergaele, F. O. and Spargaren, O.), ISSS, ISRIC, FAO, Acco, Leuven. 1998, 1st edn.
- Schutjes, A. H. M. and Van Driel, W. F., In Paper Presented at the Premier Colloque International de I’AOCASS: gestation durable de sole et de l’environment en Afi-ique, University of Arizona, 1994.
- Dialla, B. E., Indig. Knowl. Dev. Monit., 1993, 1(3), 17.
- Sikana, P., ILEIA Newsl., 1993, 15.
- Winklerprins, A. and Sandor, J. A., Geoderma, 2003, 111, 165–170.
- Barrera-Bassols, N. and Zinck, J. A., Geoderma, 2003. 111, 171–195.
- Controlled Traffic Farming: An Approach to Minimize Soil Compaction and Environmental Impact on Vegetable and Other Crops
Abstract Views :236 |
PDF Views:87
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Crop Research, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
2 Plant Breeding, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, US
1 Division of Crop Research, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
2 Plant Breeding, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, US
Source
Current Science, Vol 119, No 11 (2020), Pagination: 1760-1766Abstract
Mechanized farming for vegetable production has evolved as an integral part of commercial agriculture during the past few decades. As a first step towards mechanized farming the use of tractors in Indian agriculture has increased by 528% during the period 1990–91 to 2018–19 from 0.15 to 0.8 million/year. Undoubtedly, use of such technologies has made vegetable as well as foodgrain production a profitable venture by easing land preparation, weed management and other intercultural operations, crop harvesting, etc. However, their continuous use in production fields has resulted in the substantial compaction of soil along the wheel lines of tractors and similar heavy machinery. Reports indicate a significant yield loss (13–73%) owing to soil compaction because it restricts ischolar_main penetrance into the soil, limiting nutrient and water uptake by the plants, and also potential water stagnation, which can limit the normal activities of respiring ischolar_mains leading to retarded plant growth and ischolar_main diseases. In this context, control traffic farming (CTF), which aims to reduce the area affected by the operation of heavy machinery that otherwise lead to soil compaction, brings a substantial value to the current global focus of sustainable and precision farming. CTF attempts to restrict the spatial movement of machinery wheels to fewer operation lanes during and across production cycles for a long time and allows specifically the undisturbed areas of soil for crop production. Research confirms a significant improvement in crop yield in different crop production systems worldwide and reduction in methane emission due to soil absorption (372–2100%) compared to random traffic farming. In this article, we discuss the advantages of CTF in terms of ischolar_main growth, nutrient mobilization and energy efficiency of the vegetable production system, and also argue on its scope in the Indian context, given the situation that no or only a few studies have been reported from the country.Keywords
Controlled Traffic Farming, Environmental Impact, Soil Compaction, Vegetables.- Finding Bliss in the Fields: An Exploration of Happiness Factors of Indian Farmers
Abstract Views :46 |
PDF Views:40
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Land and Water Management, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
2 Division of Socio-Economics and Extension at ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
3 Extension Systems Management Division, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad 500 030, IN
1 Division of Land and Water Management, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
2 Division of Socio-Economics and Extension at ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
3 Extension Systems Management Division, ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad 500 030, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 125, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 369-376Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in determining the factors that contribute to the happiness and well-being of farmers. Farmers are gradually becoming engulfed in a quagmire of distress circumstances and it is time to examine how we can make their lives better. Efforts to improve the happiness and well-being of farmers in India will not only benefit them, but also their families, their communities and the entire country. The Indian Government and policy makers have a crucial role to play in improving the happiness levels of farmers by implementing policies that are geared towards addressing the challenges faced by them. By taking a multi-faceted approach and prioritizing the needs of farmers, it is possible to make significant progress towards improving their happiness and well-being.Keywords
Farmers, Happiness Factor, Income, Indicators, Policies.References
- NCRB, Farmer suicides in India, 2020; https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/adsi2020_Chapter-2-Suicides.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2023).
- United Nations World Happiness Report, 2022; https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2022/ (accessed on 1 February 2023).
- Bhattacharya, A., Global climate change and its impact on agriculture. In Changing Climate and Resource Use Efficiency in Plants, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019, pp. 1–50.
- Mukherjee, A., Prioritization of problems in integrated agriculture: a case of Rampur village in sub humid region of eastern India. Indian Res. J. Extens. Educ., 2016, 15(1), 53–59.
- Gunabhagya, A., Agricultural labour shortage: an abysmal to agriculture in north eastern Karnataka. Econ. Aff., 2017, 62(4), 295086.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Ray, M., Satyapriya and Burman, R. R., Enhancing farmers’ income through farmers’ producers companies in India: status and roadmap. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88, 1151–1161.
- Mukherjee, A. et al., Climate change risk perception, adaptation and mitigation strategy: an extension outlook in mountain Himalaya. In Conservation Agriculture: An Approach to Combat Climate Change in Indian Himalaya, Springer, Singapore, 2016, pp. 257–292; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_10
- Somashekhar, I. C., Raju, J. K. and Patil, H., Agriculture supply chain management: a scenario in India. Res. J. Soc. Sci. Manage., 2014, 4(7), 89–99.
- Chandra, N., Roy, M. L., Mukherjee, A., Jethi, R. and Joshi, K., A study of migration pattern in Kumaun Hills and associated socio-economic factors. J. Community Mobili. Sustain. Dev., 2018, 13(1), 107–112.
- Kumar, U., Raman, R. K., Kumar, A., Singh, D. K., Mukherjee, A., Singh, J. and Bhatt, B. P., Return migration of labours in Bihar due to COVID-19: status and strategies of deployment in agricultural sector. J. Community Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2020, 15(1), 192–200.
- Oswald, A. J. and Powdthavee, N., Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. J. Public Econ., 2008, 92(5–6), 1061–1077.
- Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A. and Conway, A. M., Happiness unpacked: positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 2009, 9(3), 361.
- Maslow, A. H., A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev., 1943, 50(4), 370.
- Zhang, X., Zhang, X. and Chen, X., Valuing air quality using happiness data: the case of China. Ecol. Econ., 2017, 137, 29–36.
- Tong, W., Zhu, L. and Lo, K., Livelihood adaptation and life satisfaction among land-lost farmers: critiquing China’s urbanisationdriven land appropriation. Bull. Geogr. Soc. Econ. Ser., 2019, 46(46), 149–161.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Von Berlepsch, V., Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. J. Happiness Stud., 2014, 15, 357–386.
- Liu, Z. and Shang, Q., Individual well-being in urban China: the role of income expectations. China Econ. Rev., 2012, 23(4), 833–849.
- Wang, X., Jia, X., Zhu, M. and Chen, J., Linking health states to subjective well-being: an empirical study of 5854 rural residents in China. Public Health, 2015, 129(6), 655–666.
- Tella, R. D., MacCulloch, R. J. and Oswald, A. J., The macroeconomics of happiness. Rev. Econ. Stat., 2003, 85(4), 809–827.
- Wolfers, J., Is business cycle volatility costly? Evidence from surveys of subjective well‐being. Int. Financ., 2003, 6(1), 1–26.
- Tran, N. L. T., Wassmer, R. W. and Lascher, E. L., The health insurance and life satisfaction connection. J. Happiness Stud., 2017, 18, 409–426.
- Chen, Y. H., Lee, W. C. and Tseng, K. W., Differentiation research on employee satisfaction and happiness for European invested and local Chinese companies. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., 2012, 57, 549–554.
- Qi, D. and Wu, Y., Does welfare stigma exist in China? Policy evaluation of the Minimum Living Security System on recipients’ psychological health and wellbeing. Soc. Sci. Med., 2018, 205, 26–36.
- Luchesi, B. M., de Oliveira, N. A., de Morais, D., de Paula Pessoa, R. M., Pavarini, S. C. I. and Chagas, M. H. N., Factors associated with happiness in the elderly persons living in the community. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr., 2018, 74, 83–87.
- Cheng, Z. and Smyth, R., Crime victimization, neighborhood safety and happiness in China. Econ. Model., 2015, 51, 424–435.
- Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Lin, M. and Margraf, J., Happiness, life satisfaction and positive mental health: investigating reciprocal effects over four years in a Chinese student sample. J. Res. Pers., 2019, 78, 198–209.
- Oakes, J. M. and Rossi, P. H., The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc. Sci. Med., 2003, 56(4), 769–784.
- Kamaruddin, R., Ali, J. and Saad, N. M., Happiness and its influencing factors among paddy farmers in Granary Area of Mada. World Appl. Sci. J., 2013, 28(13), 91–99.
- Ura, K. and Galay, K., Gross National Happiness and Development: Proceedings of the First Seminar on Operationalisation of Gross National Happiness. Centre for Bhutan Studies, Thimphu, Bhutan, 2004.
- Xu, Z. and Ge, R., The impact of energy consumption revolution on farmers’ happiness: an empirical analysis from China. Front. Public Health, 2022, 10, 93.
- Sutawi, S., Karmiyati, D. and Iswatinigsih, D., The happiness of smallholder layer-chicken farmers in Rural East Java, Indonesia. Trop. Anim. Sci. J., 2020, 43(3), 282–290.
- Bhadsavle, C. H., Towards a sustainable tomorrow through conservation agriculture. Indian J. Agric. Mark., 2019, 33(3s), 144–145.
- Herrera Sabillon, B., Gerster‐Bentaya, M. and Knierim, A., Measuring farmers’ well‐being: influence of farm‐level factors on satisfaction with work and quality of life. J. Agric. Econ., 2022, 73(2), 452–471.
- Strategies for Strengthening Farmer Producer Organizations in India Based on the One District One Product scheme
Abstract Views :42 |
PDF Views:36
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan 731 236, IN
2 ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
1 Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan 731 236, IN
2 ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna 800 014, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 125, No 6 (2023), Pagination: 614-622Abstract
Farmer producer organizations (FPOs) have been pivotal in empowering Indian agriculture in recent years. The Government of India has taken several steps to help in the growth of FPOs. For example, it has initiated the ‘One District One Product’ (ODOP) scheme. In each district of the states, major commodities are identified which can be promoted through FPOs. The present study focuses on the experiences in Bihar, where abundant production of cash crops like makhana (about 85% of the world’s production) has been achieved by the farmers (about 50,000 t of makhana). Despite the huge demand, makhana has been lagging in exports due to a lack of quality produce, skill, mechanization in harvesting and processing, and a near absence of value addition. In this context, integration of the ODOP scheme with FPOs can be a potential option to combat production constraints, facilitate marketing and export of the produce. This study proposes a strategy using a conceptual model, viz. technology–infrastructure–policy–export orientation (TIPE) model, that specifies the steps to be undertaken for better promotion of products through FPOs. A congenial ecosystem is necessary for the growth of producer organizations to provide a comprehensive solution with required policy backup and triggering factors that can contribute to the sustainable development of FPOs.Keywords
Agriculture, Cash Crops, Conceptual Model, Farmer Producer Organizations, Government Schemes.References
- FAO, Sustainable agriculture and rural development. Policy Brief, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2007, pp. 1–3.
- Ahmad, L., Habib Kanth, R., Parvaze, S. and Sheraz Mahdi, S., Agro-climatic and agro-ecological zones of India. In Experimental Agrometeorology: A Practical Manual, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 99–118; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69185-5_15
- Evenson, R. E. and Gollin, D., Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science, 2003, 300(5620), 758–762.
- Bachke, M. E., Are farmers’ organizations a good tool to improve small-scale farmers’ welfare? In Paper presented at the II Conferencia do IESE ‘Dinamicas da Pobreza e Padrões de Acumulação em Moçambique’, Maputo, 2009, pp. 4–29.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Satyapriya and Burman, R. R., Road map and strategies for effective viable profit-making farmer producer companies. ICAR News, 2018, pp. 16–18.
- Mukherjee, A., Roy, S., Yadav, V. K., Pradhan, K., Shubha, K., Singh, D. K. and Kumar, U., Problems faced by the vegetable based-farmers producer companies: a descriptive analysis. Veg. Sci., 2022, 49(1), 96–100.
- Mukherjee, A., Prioritization of problems in integrated agriculture: a case of Rampur village in sub humid region of Eastern India. Indian Res. J. Extens. Educ., 2016, 15(1), 53–59.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Shubha, K. and Burman, R. R., Facilitating and hindering factors affecting growth and functioning of farmers producer companies in India. Indian J. Extens. Educ., 2019, 55(4), 14–20.
- Vinayak, N., Premlata, S., Arathy, A. and Shiv, K., Farmer producer organisations: innovative institutions for upliftment of small farmers. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2019, 89(9), 1383–1392.
- NABARD, Farmer producers’ organizations (FPOs): status, issues & suggested policy reforms, 2019–20. National Paper, pp. 1–10.
- Joshi, E., Assessing India’s FPO Ecosystem, Tata Cornell University News, 2022.
- Kumar, A., Singh, R. K. P., Chandra, N., Bharati, R. C., Kumar, U. J. J. W. A. L. and Mishra, J. S., Foodgrain production performance in Bihar: a temporal analysis. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88, 1227–1232.
- Vutukuru, V. K., Singh, P. and Kumar, M., A decade of rural transformation. Lessons learnt from the Bihar rural livelihoods project – Jeevika, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 69–76.
- Nayaji, A. and Dixit, S., Farmers producers organizations (FPO) in Bihar: a road ahead. Innovations, 2021, 66, 425–431.
- APEDA Export Strategy: Part II – Focus Product. 2017; https://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/Announcements/APEDA%20Export%20-Strategy%20(Part-2).pdf (accessed on 15 January 2021).
- Area and production of fruits, vegetables, plantation crops and aromatic plants in Bihar, 2021; horticulture.bihar.gov.in/Main Site/Statistics.aspx (accessed on 16 June 2022).
- Horticulture Statistics at a Glance, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare (MoAFW), 2018; https://nhb.gov.in/statistics/Publication/Horticulture%20At%20a%20Glance%-202017%20for%20net%20uplod%20(2).pdf (accessed on 16 June 2022).
- https://mofpi.nic.in/pmfme/one-district-one-product (accessed on 14 June 2022).
- Singh, D. K., Kumar, A., Kumar, U., Singh, I. S., Chandra, N. and Bhatt, B. P., Value chain analysis of Makhana. ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, 2020, pp. 1–22.
- Balyan, K., Shiv Kumar, Chahal, V. P. and Sandeep Kumar, Dynamics of Indian fresh mango export. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2015, 85(11), 1466–1471.
- GoI, Area and production of horticulture crops report – All India. MoFAW, Government of India, 2018, pp. 1–2.
- Nayak, A. K. and Nahar, S., Growth, instability and export performance of banana in India – an economic analysis. Agric. Situat. India, 2018, 74(10), 25–33.
- Karadipatil, S. and Welfare, D. S., SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of farmer producer companies in north-eastern Karnataka. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., 2021, 6, 2456–2165.
- Manaswi, B. H., Kumar, P., Prakash, P., Anbukkani, P., Kar, A., Jha, G. K. and Lenin, V., Evaluation of farmer producer organizations of Telangana: a SWOT analysis approach. J. Commun. Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2019, 14, 457–466.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Roy, M., Satyapriya and Burman, R. R., Enhancing farmers income through farmers producers’ companies in India: status and roadmap. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 88(8), 1151–1161.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, P., Maity, A., Shubha, K. and Burman, R. R., Enhancing livelihood security of dairy farmers through farmers’ producer company: a diagnostic study of Bundelkhand region. Range Manage. Agrofor., 2020, 41(1), 156–167.
- Gorai, S. K., Wason, M., Padaria, R. N., Rao, D. U. M., Paul, S. and Paul, R. K., SWOT and constraint analysis of farmer producer organisations in West Bengal. J. Community Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2022, 17, 197–203.
- Rajkhowa, P. and Qaim, M., Personalized digital extension services and agricultural performance: evidence from smallholder farmers in India. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16, e0259319.
- Ayub, G. and Siraj, M., Mango commodity chain study: knowledge gap and use of ICTs in the Chain in India. Report of CABI South Asia, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 2018, pp. 1–15.